More adventures

We continue our harrowing story of la petite americaine.

Professor Claude clicks through the slides to an image of a medieval marriage. “This is Charles IV,” he says, “Who was the first king of France, in a way.”

He is about to move to the next slide when a student (Dave, age 40) says, “Who is that angry-looking woman in the back?”

He points and the classroom strains to see a green-clad woman with a dour expression in the left corner. Admittedly, it’s a strange sight for a wedding portrait. Why include her? Why is she upset?

“I don’t know exactly,” says the professor. “We will probably never know.”

La petite americaine knows.

“Sir,” she says, “that is Blanche. She is the king’s former wife. She had two boys who died as babies and then an affair with a courtisan, so Charles divorced her to marry the other woman in the painting.”

The class turns to look at la petite americaine. Nobody ever volunteers information like that in class. That is not how it goes.

“Well,” Professor Claude says, “perhaps that is a good guess, but I do not know for certain.”

“I do,” she retorts, “I do know that for certain. Her name was Blanche.”

“Well, well,” he capitulates. We will see about that.

The professor brings up Wikipedia on his laptop and searches for Charles IV. Right there, under the list of spouses, is a woman named Blanche. He clicks the link and is presented with information on her life, including her affair and short-lived children. Because his laptop is hooked up to the projector, the class follows along.

Well, well, the professor says again.

He turns to the student who asked the question. There is your answer, I suppose, he says. The professor does not acknowledge la petite americaine for the rest of the class.

She is, to put it mildly, a bit miffed.

Later on, the class examines a symbolic painting of the death of a knight. An unearthly hand reaches down from the heavens to carry him to Paradise, and the hand has a halo around it. Oh, la petite americaine thinks, that is a straightforward metaphor. The hand is a saint or angel.

The professor calls on a young man who is well known on campus for being Catholic, because he wears a giant wooden crucifix everywhere he goes.

What do you interpret this to mean, he asks.

The hand has a halo around it, so it must be a saint or an angel. Also it is coming down from the sky, so it is coming from Heaven.

WOW, the professor says, and then has the entire class applaud him.

Steam rolls out of the ears of la petite americaine.

Thus concludes our short look into a moment in the studies of our heroine.

Cordialement,

Allison

P.S.:

10 thoughts on “More adventures

  1. I’m a French student from a class that reads you together in class. We all read your blogs on our phones while our teacher reads it on the board. We have a few people who were wondering, how did you know who Blanche of Burgundy was??

    Like

    1. Are you in Monsieur Gillis’s class? I knew about Blanche because I am only really capable of absorbing useless ephemera into my long-term memory. I studied the subject before we talked about it and that was the only fact I pulled out.

      Like

      1. Yes, I am in his class, and I have the same singular capability. I usually am not able to absorb what I need to in my brain. I only truly absorb what interests me.

        Like

    1. There isn’t a whole lot of difference, when it comes to meals and such. The candy is the thing that’s different. Chocolate and soft bread is all you can get in vending machines and stores. Every time I see Oreos, I stock up immediately. Also they don’t have beef jerky. I made real fried chicken for dinner tonight, so it isn’t impossible to live here.

      Like

    1. …interesting question. Are we talking just poultry? Because if so, you can say poule or poulet or poussin. If you are trying to call someone chicken, call them a froussard.

      Like

Leave a comment